Boris Johnson ‘forgot’ about investigation into disgraced MP


Boris Johnson was told about an investigation into Chris Pincher’s inappropriate behaviour in 2019, despite days of Number 10 saying the prime minister was unaware of specific allegations against his former deputy chief whip.

Mr Pincher resigned his post last week after he was accused of groping two men in a private members club, but it emerged on Monday he had already been investigated for his conduct when working as a foreign office minister three years ago.

In an explosive letter to parliament’s standard’s commissioner published on Tuesday, former Foreign Office permanent secretary Lord McDonald accused Downing Street of making “inaccurate claims”, saying they “keep changing their story and are still not telling the truth”.

Speaking to reporters today, a No 10 spokesman confirmed Mr Johnson was briefed on the complaint in late 2019, but said the PM stood by appointing Mr Pincher again in February 2022 as, “at the time when he offered the job, he was not aware of any new specific allegations that were being looked at”.

Politics Hub: Boris Johnson under mounting pressure for explanation

The spokesman also suggested the PM had forgotten he was briefed about the incident, saying: “I would add a caveat at least that this was related to a conversation, and what I believe to have been a brief conversation, that took place around three years ago.”

Asking an urgent question in the Commons, Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner: “The prime minister was personally informed about these allegations, and yet he was either negligent, or complicit.

More on Chris Pincher

“What message does this send about the standards of this government and what they set?”

But Paymaster General Michael Ellis insisted the PM had “acted with probity at all times”, adding: “As soon as he was reminded [of the briefing], the Number 10 press office corrected their public lines.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner accuses Downing Street of being in an

Shortly before Lord McDonald’s letter was published, Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab told Sky News’ Kay Burley that he knew about the allegation when he was foreign secretary in 2019.

He said he had “made it clear in no uncertain terms” to Mr Pincher that the behaviour “must never be repeated”, and he referred it to both the civil service and Cabinet Office for investigation.

But Mr Raab said the inquiries did not “trigger disciplinary action”, and he had only told the PM about the incident “in recent days”.

Mr Johnson led a cabinet meeting this morning, letting cameras in for his opening remarks – but not allowing any questions from journalists.

Surrounded by his serious-faced ministers, the prime minister spoke about the cost of living crisis and his plans to tackle it, but there was no mention of Mr Pincher or Lord McDonald’s letter.

A number of Conservative MPs criticised their leader over the handling of Mr Pincher.

Chair of the Liaison Committee – who Mr Johnson will face for a grilling on Wednesday – Sir Bernard Jenkin said promoting people with the “wrong attitudes and the wrong behaviours” gave “permission for the wrong attitudes and the wrong behaviours to persist”.

Fellow committee chair William Wragg accused the government of having “no regard” for upholding standards in public life, asking ministers to “consider the common sense of decency that I know the vast, vast majority of them have and ask themselves if they can any longer tolerate being part of a government which, for better or worse, is widely regarded of having lost its sense of direction”.

His point was echoed by backbench MP John Penrose, who also questioned when ministers would say “enough is enough”.

Full text of the letter

Five days after Mr Pincher’s resignation as deputy chief whip, there remains significant confusion surrounding complaints about his behaviour prior to the drunkenness he admits at the Carlton Club on 29 June.

Inaccurate claims by 10 Downing Street continue to be repeated in the media. On 3 July, the BBC website reported: “No official complaints against [Mr Pincher] were ever made.”

This is not true. In the summer of 2019, shortly after he was appointed minister of state at the Foreign Office, a group of officials complained to me about Mr Pincher’s behaviour. I discussed the matter with the relevant official at the Cabinet Office. (In substance, the allegations were similar to those made about his behaviour at the Carlton Cub.) An investigation upheld the complaint; Mr Pincher apologised and promised not to repeat the inappropriate behaviour. There was no repetition at the FCO before he left seven months later.

The same BBC website report continued: “Downing Street has said Boris Johnson was not aware of any specific allegations when he appointed Mr Pincher deputy chief whip in February.” By 4 July, the BBC website reflected a change in No 10’s line: “The prime minister’s official spokesman said Mr Johnson knew of “allegations that were either resolved or did not progress to a formal complaint”, adding that ‘it was deemed not appropriate to stop an appointment simply because of unsubstantiated allegations’.”

The original No 10 line is not true and the modification is still not accurate. Mr Johnson was briefed in person about the initiation and outcome of the investigation. There was a “formal complaint”. Allegations were “resolved” only in the sense that the investigation was completed; Mr Pincher was not exonerated. To characterise the allegations as “unsubstantiated” is therefore wrong.

I am aware that is unusual to write to you and simultaneously publicise the letter. I am conscious of the duty owed to the target of an investigation but I act out of of my duty towards the victims. Mr Pincher deceived me and others in 2019. He cannot be allowed to use the confidentiality of the process three years ago to pursue his predatory behaviour in other contexts.

Mr Pincher resigned as the government’s deputy chief whip on Thursday after allegations he drunkenly groped two men at a private members club in London earlier that week.

The party whip was only removed from him – leaving him sitting as an independent MP for his Tamworth constituency – on Friday afternoon after the PM bowed to pressure, and a formal complaint was made to parliament’s Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme (ICGS).

Read more:
What did Johnson know about Pincher groping claims and when? Here’s what Downing Street has said
‘Pound shop Harvey Weinstein’: Allegations against MP Chris Pincher go back 21 years

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What Raab knew about Pincher

A number of ministers then took to the airwaves to reiterate Number 10’s defence of Mr Johnson, including education minister Will Quince, who said on Monday he had been given “categorical assurance” the PM was not aware of any serious specific allegations.

But later in the day, Sky News revealed the PM’s wife, Carrie Johnson, also questioned Mr Pincher’s suitability as a government whip as far back as 2017.

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

The deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats, Daisy Cooper, said Lord McDonald had “shone a new light on this murky cover-up”.

She added: “Boris Johnson needs to own up to his web of lies and finally come clean today. Every day this carries on our politics gets dragged further through the mud.”

And the SNP’s Brendan O’Hara called for an investigation into the PM, saying the letter “demolishes Boris Johnson’s claims and raises serious questions over whether he has lied and broken the ministerial code”.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Apart From Chicxulub, Another Asteroid Might Have Contributed to Dinosaur Extinction
Walmart CEO Doug McMillon says even wealthier families are penny-pinching
Salman Rushdie attack suspect pleads not guilty to attempted murder
Labour calls for return of parliament ahead of energy price cap rise
Voyager customer lost $1 million saved over 24 years and is one of many now desperate to recoup funds

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.