Generally speaking the genre of film known as the “disaster movie” is not particularly well regarded among the more “serious” film viewer. While there are certainly exceptions, disaster movies currency is usually spectacle, and as such there’s little attention given to minor details like “character” or “plot.” Just fill the screen with things blowing up are cities being flooded and viewers will get what they expected, and, at least in theory, be happy with that. So there probably wasn’t a great deal of high expectation in Greenland, and yet the movie is, maybe, pretty good? Or, at the very least, it’s not that bad.

You May Also Like

Oscar-Winning Screenwriter Paul Haggis Arrested in Italy for Sexual Assault

Paul Haggis — famous for writing/directing 2006’s Best Picture, “Crash” — has…

Anna Faris Reveals Why It Really Was Such Shocking News When She And Chris Pratt Split

Rachel Bilson dated Star Wars’ Anakin Skywalker, Hayden Christensen, for ten years…

Fire Breaks Out on Warner Brothers Studio Lot, Black Smoke Fills Air

Play video content Twitter / @MyNameIsRaph, @RandyTroy It looked like a scene…

Dakota Johnson Shares Feelings On Johnny Depp, Armie Hammer And Shia LaBeouf Amid Controversies

Dakota Johnson has worked with a large number of incredible actors and…